Creator benchmarks · X live · more platforms coming

Is 2.1% engagement
actually good?

For a 50K account, that's top-third. For 800 followers, it's below the median. Context is everything — get your analytics graded against creators your size.

Drop your analytics screenshot

or click to browse · PNG, JPG, WebP · up to 3 files

Screenshots are read once and discarded — never stored.

Free · no signup · ~30 seconds

Which platform should we grade next?

X — live
0-1k median engagement 3.50%0-1k median reach 1.50×1k-5k median engagement 2.80%1k-5k median reach 1.20×5k-10k median engagement 2.20%5k-10k median reach 1.00×10k-25k median engagement 1.80%10k-25k median reach 0.85×25k-50k median engagement 1.50%25k-50k median reach 0.75×50k-100k median engagement 1.20%50k-100k median reach 0.65×100k+ median engagement 1.00%100k+ median reach 0.55×

sample report · 1K - 5K tier

indie maker · 4.2K followers

B
65/100top 35%
Engagement rateP58
Reach multiplierP99
Engagement qualityP72
4.2K followers · 28dbenxmark.com

The report card

One grade. Eight metrics.
Zero guessing.

Every metric is scored as a percentile against your follower tier, plotted on its real distribution — so you see exactly where you sit, not just a number floating in space.

A grade you can defend

S+ to D, from a weighted blend of your percentiles. The math is public.

Distribution curves, not vibes

Each metric plotted on your tier's curve with your position marked.

What to fix first

Your two strongest signals and two focus areas, with concrete moves.

A card worth posting

A share image rendered server-side — the link works forever.

Thirty seconds, start to grade

01

Screenshot

Grab your X analytics screen — up to three shots if it doesn't fit.

02

Extract

AI reads every number. You review and correct anything before scoring.

03

Score

Each metric lands on your tier's distribution as a percentile.

04

Share

A permanent link and a report card image, ready to post.

No black box

You can check our math.

Every formula, weight, and distribution is documented. Percentiles come from log-normal fits of each tier's quartiles; your grade is a weighted mean of them. When live community data replaces a baseline, the report says so. If we're wrong somewhere, tell us — publicly.

Fair questions

Is my data stored?+

Your screenshot is read once and discarded. The extracted numbers are only added to the anonymous benchmark pool when you submit them — no handle, no account, no login.

Where do the benchmarks come from?+

Each tier starts from curated baseline distributions built on public engagement research. As creators benchmark themselves, real community data replaces the baselines per tier — the results page tells you which one scored you.

What counts as my tier?+

Seven follower brackets, from 0–1K up to 100K+. You're only ever compared against accounts in your own bracket — an 800-follower writer is never measured against a 2M-follower brand.

Why percentiles instead of averages?+

Creator metrics are heavily skewed — a handful of viral outliers drag averages up until they're meaningless. A percentile tells you exactly how many accounts your size you outperform.

What does it cost?+

Nothing. The benchmark, the report, the share card — all free. The community dataset gets better with every submission, and that's the point.

Your numbers already exist.
Find out what they mean.